Overseas missions are great... Churches should support them.
Activities which provide support for regional and outback communities are vital... Churches should support them.
Denominational mission activities need support. As do missionaries... No doubt.
BUT... Outflowing from a recent line of questioning from a budget meeting... If a church, for whatever unforeseen reason, HAD to spend the money they invest in widespread mission work locally, could they find a way to spend it?
I ask because I'm curious about how many churches are aware of local mission needs.
Could churches find places within five kilometers to spend, say, $10,000-20,000?
If not, what does that say about the church?
If not, what does that say about the connection they have with their local community?
If not, what does that say about the connection they have with their neighboring churches and para-church organisations?
No comments:
Post a Comment