I’ve just started reading a book about reading.
To quote my youngest, when she spotted the book next to my bed, “that sounds boring.”
Honestly, it may well end up being a dull slog.
Hopefully, the book will, at least, help me be able to teach advanced literacy somewhat better to my senior classes.
Currently, the book is making the good point about the way we teach literacy in schools.
In general, we’re satisfied by year 6. Maybe year 8.
When our students are younger, we heavily focus on literacy. We have to, they are still learning language.
But, our focus on literacy quickly drops away in high school. Due to the sheer amount of content that our subjects need to plough through, literacy becomes incidental.
Really, the only time high schools are forced to focus on literacy in the upper grades is to have their students meet the minimum standards required in order to complete year 12.
Minimum. Standards.
This is around the literacy level of a decent year 8 or 9.
The book I’m reading makes the point that this is around the age/level that we cease teaching intentional literacy.
How to read.
How to skim.
How to note-take.
How to form an argument.
Grammar.
All of these tend to stagnate in junior high.
I wonder if a similar thing happens in our churches.
We intentionally teach them about the faith while they are children and teens.
Then, we start to drop this focus.
We start to settle for the minimum standard (like the ones I posted about in my last post).
We don’t really hold our congregations to an adult level of understanding.
Because we are saved by grace, not by our ability to pass a theological exam, we allow our adults to stagnate in their understanding.
No one is expected to genuinely wrestle with the concept of the trinity or the early heresies of the church.
No one is expected to be aware of the spread of the faith and the obstacles the early church had to overcome.
No one is expected to wrestle with the difficult passages of the bible unless they are touched on via the pulpit.
Are our churches, like it could be argued that our schools, only producing underdeveloped “products” because we don’t expect them to reach beyond the minimum standard?