I’m fairly unusual.
I can wrestle aloud with the bible, the incarnation, the trinity, the way God reveals Himself and the questions surround creation, suffering and the afterlife.
I can tell you about the Four Rightly Guided Caliphs, the Quran, the Hadith, the six foundational beliefs of Islam, the Five Pillars and Islamic jurisprudence.
I can outline the Four Noble Truths, the Eightfold Path, the Tripitaka and the Five Precepts.
As a part of my job I get to teach senior-high-school students about religion.
I get to take interested teens in a deep dive into Christianity, Islam and Buddhism (amongst others).
As a consequence, I know a fair bit about these three faiths.
I can tell you about the historical contexts, origins, expansion, founders, principal beliefs, sacred texts, ethical decision making principles and practical out-workings across three worldviews.
This makes me unusual.
Many others Christians couldn’t tell you about the any more than the very basic details of other religions.
Of course, the temptation is to be biased.
To let my personal worldview colour the way I present the alternate viewpoints.
But, I don’t.
I try to be fair.
As a foundation of my subject, I must be impartial.
My subject must be based upon understanding.
It must steer away from conversion.
And, I appreciate this.
For, I think there is nothing at all wrong about presenting faiths fairly - including Christianity.
Why?
Because I don’t want to be giving Christianity an unfair advantage which, frankly, it doesn’t need.
Christianity can stand up for itself.
Jesus can stand up for himself.
The bible can stand up for itself.
They don’t need me to defend them.
All they need is for me to be clear.
Just as I need to be for the Islamic and Buddhist faiths.
And, when presented with all the facts, I think it is a sign of faith to believe that Christianity shows itself to be trustworthy.
The fight - or classroom - doesn’t need to be rigged in its favour…